I spoke today at a vigil for those killed and injured during the act of domestic terrorism last Sunday in Las Vegas. The spokesperson from Moms Demand Action said something during her introduction that I found curious. She said that the group is not against guns; rather, the group opposes against gun violence. A quick internet search found this sentiment expressed by a number of activists associated with Moms Demand Action.
I support the work of all the organizations advocating for legislation that will stem the gun epidemic in this country. This approach seems to me, however, timid and lacking in the grounding necessary to effect any real change.
I am against guns. I am against the Ruger AR-556 Takedown semiautomatic tactical rifle, the Bushmaster QRC Quick Response Carbine semiautomatic tactical rifle with mini red dot, the Colt LE6920 semiautomatic tactical rifle, and the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 Sport II semiautomatic tactical rifle (each of these weapons is available for purchase from Cabela’s Outfitters). I see no reason why these weapons should exist outside of the military and law enforcement – and only in very special cases for the latter. The threat these weapons pose to the safety, health, and well-being of this nation far exceeds any possible benefit that can be derived from their private ownership.
I don’t give a damn about curtailing the profits of the manufacturers, imposing onerous regulations on gun shops, or any individual’s claim to the inalienable right to buy these weapons. We routinely ban products deemed unsafe for consumers and even prevent products predicted to be unsafe from ever being marketed. These guns serve no purpose but the expeditious killing of people from a distance. Therefore, they should be banned.
There is only one more vigil I want to officiate – the memorial for the death of semiautomatic rifles.